Thursday, January 25, 2007

Praxis

I wrote a little bit after reading
w.h. auden's poem, "The Fall of Rome":

"Caesar's double-bed is warm
As an unimportant clerk
Writes I DO NOT LIKE MY WORK
On a pink official form."
Lauren's single-bed is soft and warm
as a wistful lyric expanding, unfurls,
does write itself: I DO NOT LIKE MY WORLD
on a pink and scented page it, worried, informs.

And here I start to consider the term 'Praxis' and how I function in
my world. As a semi-globally aware individual, I find myself increasingly
torn between maintaining my personal sanity and routinely letting the
horrors of the planet wash over and distract me from my homework.

There's an excellent American Indian proverb that goes as follows:
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

And so while I'm still at the point in my life where I'm not thinking about my
progeny, I'm constantly frustrated by the nagging I am subjected to by my
parents about needing to fix my world. I certainly resent the defeatist
attitude that their generation seems to be promoting, though I can't say
for certain that they are a representative sample. Yet to see just two people
give up is enough for me to understand how easy it is for an entire society,
country, or planet to forcibly overlook the eminent disasters of this globe.
And I'd like to be generous and use the word 'forcibly' as I'd rather not
consider the kinds of individuals that enjoy or actively pursuit ignorance
for the sake of very vulnerable bliss.

Anyway, getting back to praxis...Personally, like many and most, I've developed or accepted numerous theories and beliefs concerning the world that surrounds me. My understanding
of factory farming, global warming, and needless animal cruelty, all motivate me
to actively follow a vegetarian diet. Yet praxis becomes a problem when we aren't
able to entirely adhere to our own outlines. Those individuals that opt for
ignorance or dis-concern do not have problems with praxis, nor do they struggle
with the shameful sense of hypocrisy when theories are bent and broken. But my
understanding of dairy farms producing in the factory fashion has not ceased my
intake of at least some dairy products (though in my defense, it's organic as often as I
can afford).

And while even my basic vegetarianism may make me feel a little less guilty about the amount
of damage I inflict on other beings and the environment, it still seems insufficient.
It's difficult to recognize these praxises flaws... and the frustration often builds to
the point where it seems that resorting to eco-terrorism or performing mass animal genocide (just to get humans to the point where they feel capable of starting over and investigating sustainable animal rearing) is the only way to make a recognizable difference.

It is certainly going to take a drastic global change to reinvent this miserable pattern,
but regardless of the affects, it should be openly accepted. Change is a necessary
evolution, an action that occurs because the present level is no longer sustainable
and no longer desirable.

Unfortunately, I see the change in the world-eye concerning the treatment/consumption of non-human animals as being one that is only going to be (effectively?) inspired by a
social fad. Trivial social fluctuation is a pathetic and insecure method of revolutionizing
the world, but at this point, we need to be grateful for what we can get. Even baby steps
move us closer to either an ideal world, or, well, a non-existent one.

I am most reminded of the 'green revolution' in which we may or may not be presently involved. But the only reason green industry has a whisp of a chance to survive is because corporate investors think it will be an extremely lucrative field. Though their motivation for financial investement is sadly misguided, or ill-guided, I cannot deny the world benefit of such developments. In this way Individual praxises that seem to disagree can find an agreeable point. The means to varied ends overlap and find an uncomfortable comprimise, but a compramise nonetheless.

3 comments:

David K. Braden-Johnson said...

Like you suggest near the end of your post, I can see no reason -- aside from misguided purist or ideological ones -- to reject the unintended yet positive (if, ultimately, inadequate) consequences of others' actions. We can easily underestimate the potential industrial interest in pursuing ecologically sustainable practices, once their defensive barriers to nontraditional methods/products melt away: animals are a needlessly costly input into production/experimentation.

Diseria / Tanya said...

“We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.” That should be on a bumper sticker, on a t-shirt (I’d buy one)... maybe even a billboard (if it weren’t a waste of paper)...

‘Inheritance’ alone shows _so much_ of the current day mindset, the spoiled rotten brats who don’t know the value of what they have. Or, if they know the value, they disregard it in light of monetary value... Someplace, there’s a disconnect between the short-term gain (money), and the long-term gain (a place to live). Indeed, even a crossing of values, since money is seen as long-term -- further inheritance.

Change will happen. We’ll never know which way the pendulum will swing, nor if it can be directed. Change _has to_ happen because the world is a dynamic entity.

You know, everyday I wish for some horrific global disaster to happen. I want a ‘reset’ button. I want to start the game over. I want to live in a society that relishes the earth, rather than ravishes.

‘Situation X’ has become a mental fantasy for me... because _then_ I think we could really affect some change.
But, you know what? ...that’s the easy way out. And there’s no guarentee that those people left over would actually listen to us (assuming that we made it through).
(Moses led his people through the desert for 40 years... because he wanted a completely different generation of people to work with. Lucky for him, Moses lived past the general life expectancy!)

Although I wish for a reset button, like I wish for the magical wand that makes all problems disappear, and the Book of Answers (that my mother _still_ hasn’t recieved!), we cannot rely on them.

Deep down, we know that we can’t wait for some global disaster -- what if it never happens?

Thus, I am left with baby steps. Baby steps are all I know how to do. Somedays they make me feel strong (yes, I AM changing! go me!), and other days I feel weakened by them (that’s ALL I can do?? pfft!). But ‘immediate gratification’ does not lend well to the toil and patience of a progressive change.

I take pride in my baby steps because they show me making a difference in myself. How can I expect others to listen to me if I, myself, do not embrace the changes themselves? (and, by the way, you’re like 5 steps ahead of me, so take pride in that!)

I’m also humbled by my baby steps... because I’m not capable of just *snap* changing. I don’t know how to do that, and when I tried, I ended up feeling guilty because I was ‘incapable’. Thus, I have to take everything one at a time, one moment at a time.

How can we expect anything different from humanity? For the random person on the street, their first realization is the very idea of baby steps, of slow *SLOW* change.

‘Do as I say, not as I do.’ My father raised me using that phrase... ‘I’m an adult, I know better.. I’m grown, you’re young, listen to me but don’t imitate me...’ Took me _years_ of frustration and grey hairs to make him realize the bass-ackward-ness of that mentality. And that was just one blue-collared man...

As I read on a fortune cookie: ‘Discontent is the first sign of progress.’
So how to make people feel discontent with their actions? (discontent nags worse than any mother because at least you can walk away from your mother -- you cannot walk away from yourself...)




“Yet praxis becomes a problem when we aren't able to entirely adhere to our own outlines. Those individuals that opt for ignorance or dis-concern do not have problems with praxis, nor do they struggle with the shameful sense of hypocrisy when theories are bent and broken.”

...shame denotes a social/community impact on an individual. I don’t know about you, but it’s only been _very_ recently that I’ve become aware of the fact that I am, whether I want to be or not, a part of society. I’m having ‘Reverse-Atlantis-Syndrome’ -- I was an island, and instead of my island sinking, land suddenly raised up all around me. And for the first time, my ignorance raises a feeling of shame instead of guilt. I actually feel a level of responsibility for those people!! .....it's totally weird.... seriously.

With this realization, I feel my own hypocrisy. I’ve been made aware of my inconsistancies, and now I’m discontent. (On a somewhat related yet separate tangent: this realization of hypocrisy has also made me aware of the first baby step in quitting smoking. The habit has become unconscious, so I must make it conscious -- today, I have started keeping count of my smokes on an index card. I expect to be thoroughly disgusted with myself tonight, and so maybe tomorrow I’ll deny myself one or two, and mark them down as x’s.)

Has there been a shift in the feelings of hypocrisy? Has the connotation or the denotation changed? The word shaved so that its weight of what it truly means lessened? Or do we just ignore the word’s ethical meaning, laugh it off as we laugh away so many other words, and continue on without a second thought?

Maybe we need a new line of t-shirts (preferably made in the USA) to point out people’s inconsistancies...

Pro-life means ALL life! or

Pro-choice means EVERYTHING has a choice! or
Tolerance extends to ALL LIFE! (I’m fairly certain that we could word these better, but the idea of working in two beliefs that by themselves are inconsitant with each other...)

If you relish eating meat,
but you hate abortions --
Then you’re a hypocrite!

*laughs* That might start more scuffles than discussions... however, it might be the center of discussion for the offended later in the day.

Planting seeds, man! Let us be Janey Appleseeds! (ha! there’s even a pun in that! seeds of change towards vegetarianism.. apple-seeds...) ((okay, it's kinda stretched, but it made me chuckle... lol))

David K. Braden-Johnson said...

"If you relish eating meat,
but you hate abortions --
Then you’re a hypocrite!"

Or a radical homocentrist.